So who was the real winner of the Iowa Caucuses?

Obviously Huckabee and Obama were the actual winners of the Iowa Caucuses in that they received the most delagates to the Iowa convention, but which candidate actually gained the most from their performance (or the performance of others) in the Iowa caucus? To figure this out, let's look at the Iowa Electronic Market, a futures market where people can legally bet on the 2008 elections. Here's the Republican futures for January 2nd, the day before the election (converted into percent change of winning the nomination):

Romney: 32.3%
McCain: 25.6%
Guiliani: 22.2%
Huckabee: 12.8%
Thompson: 6.1%
ROF (including Paul): 3.4%

And here's today's averages, parenthetically followed by the candidate's change since the 2nd:

McCain: 30.6% (+5.0%)
Guiliani: 24.2% (+2.0%)
Huckabee: 19.7% (+6.9%)
Romney: 16.9% (-15.4%)
ROF (including Paul): 5.3% (+1.9%)
Thompson: 3.3% (-2.8%)

As expected, Huckabee was the largest gainer, but McCain (my Republican of choice) was actually not far behind, despite finishing fourth behind big loser Romney and moderate loser Thompson. In fact, McCain's fourth-place finish has somehow propelled him into the favorite to win the Republican nomination, while Romney's second-place finish has dropped him from first to not even one of the top three candidates. Go figure, I guess.

Not that you can't already accurately hypothesize what happened to the Democrats, but we'll do them as well. From January 2nd:

Clinton: 61.3%
Obama: 28.4%
Edwards: 11.3%
ROF (including Richardson): 1.7%

And from today:

Clinton: 50.7% (-10.6%)
Obama: 44.7% (+16.3%)
Edwards: 3.7% (-7.6%)
ROF (including Richardson): 0.7% (-1.0%)

oh so lovingly written byMatthew |  these are comments, absent.


short & sour.
oh dear.
messages antérieurs.
music del yo.
lethargy.
"i live to frolf."
friends.
people i know, then.
a nother list.
narcissism.













Current Mortgage Rates  Chicago CD Rates  Financial Aggregating